Free Consultation
(602) 899-8000
White Collar Crime

Computer Tampering Lawyers, AZ

In the digital age, computer tampering charges in Arizona represent a unique and complex area of the law. Computer Crimes Defense Lawyer Phoenix at Feldman & Royle offers specialized legal expertise to navigate these technologically advanced cases. Whether it involves unauthorized access, data manipulation, or cyber vandalism, our team is equipped to handle the intricacies of computer tampering allegations. We are committed to providing a comprehensive defense, understanding the technical aspects of each case, and ensuring that your digital rights and freedoms are vigorously defended.
Understand 

Computer Tampering/ Internet Crime Laws in Arizona

Arizona defines computer tampering under A.R.S. § 13-2316 as knowingly accessing, altering, damaging, or destroying any computer or computer system without authorization. This can include a range of activities –

  • from hacking into a system,
  • introducing a virus,
  • altering or deleting data,
  • to using a computer for schemes like fraud or theft.

In layman’s terms, computer tampering, in the context of Arizona law, involves unauthorized access or manipulation of computer systems, data, or networks. Our computer crimes defense lawyers at Feldman & Royle have expertise in cyber law and emphasize the importance of understanding the specific legal definitions and implications of computer tampering, as it can have significant legal consequences in defending your case. We also help you understand that the intent behind the actions and the extent of the damage or alteration play a crucial role in these cases.

Know Your Rights

Your Rights in Computer Tampering Cases

Our Computer Crimes Defense Lawyer at Feldman & Royle advises that individuals accused of computer tampering have specific rights, including the right to legal representation and the right to challenge the evidence against them. It’s essential to seek a lawyer experienced in cyber law to navigate the complexities of these cases effectively.

In Arizona computer tampering cases (governed primarily by ARS § 13-2316), individuals have the same fundamental rights as those accused of any other crime, along with specific defense considerations relevant to computer offenses:

Core Constitutional Rights:

  • Right to Remain Silent: You have the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement. Anything you say can be used against you.
  • Right to an Attorney: You have the right to have a computer crimes defense lawyer present during questioning and throughout all stages of the legal process. If you cannot afford one, one will be appointed to you.
  • Right to Due Process: This includes the right to a fair trial, to be informed of the charges against you, and to present a defense.
  • Right to Confront Witnesses: You have the right to question witnesses who testify against you.
  • Right to Present a Defense: You can introduce evidence and call witnesses on your behalf.
  • Right Against Unlawful Search and Seizure: Evidence obtained through an illegal search of your devices or property cannot be used against you.

Specific Considerations in Computer Tampering Cases:

  • Challenging Intent: Computer tampering often requires a specific intent (e.g., to defraud, to damage, to disrupt). A key right is to challenge the prosecution’s claim that you had this intent. This could involve arguing that the action was accidental, or that you lacked the knowledge to form such intent.
  • Challenging Authorization/Consent: If you had permission to access or use the computer system, that can be a strong defense. You have the right to present evidence of such authorization.
  • Challenging Sufficiency of Evidence: You have the right to argue that the prosecution has not provided enough evidence to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This might involve scrutinizing digital forensics, network logs, or expert testimony.
  • Forfeiture: Be aware that a conviction can lead to the forfeiture of computer systems or instruments exclusively used in the commission of the offense. You have the right to contest such forfeiture.

Given the technical nature and severe penalties (felony classifications ranging from Class 6 to Class 2) associated with computer tampering, exercising these rights effectively almost always requires the expertise of a skilled internet crime defense attorney in Phoenix, such as our lawyers at Feldman & Royle.

Proven. Excellent. Justice

We can help with a clearly defined defense strategy. Consult For FREE.
Defenses

Defending Against Computer Tampering Charges

Defenses against computer tampering charges can vary. Feldman & Royle often explore defenses such as lack of intent to cause harm, authorization to access the system in question, or challenging the evidence regarding the extent of damage or alteration. In some cases, demonstrating a lack of knowledge or understanding of the actions being illegal can also be a defense.

Defending against computer tampering charges (ARS § 13-2316) in Arizona often involves challenging specific elements the prosecution must prove. Here are common defenses:

  • Lack of Intent: Many computer tampering offenses require a specific intent (e.g., to defraud, to damage, to disrupt, to terrorize). If the defense can show the action was accidental, a mistake, or lacked the required criminal intent, charges may be reduced or dismissed.
  • Authorization or Consent: If you had permission or authority from the computer owner or a person with proper authority to access, alter, or use the system in the way you did, this negates the “without authority or exceeding authorization” element of the crime.
  • Insufficient Evidence: The prosecution must prove every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. A computer criminal defense lawyer can challenge the strength or validity of the evidence, including digital forensics, network logs, or witness testimony.
  • Mistaken Identity: In some cybercrime cases, the actual perpetrator may be misidentified, or your computer/network may have been compromised and used by someone else without your knowledge.
  • Illegal Search and Seizure: If law enforcement obtained evidence (e.g., from your computer or devices) through a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights, that evidence may be deemed inadmissible in court.
  • Lack of Knowledge: Depending on the specific subsection of ARS 13-2316, arguing that you were unaware your actions were unauthorized or illegal could be a viable defense.

No Legitimate Purpose for Reckless Conduct (Specific to § 13-2316(A)(5)): For charges related to recklessly using a computer to alarm or terrorize, the prosecution must also prove the conduct served no legitimate purpose and caused substantial emotional distress to a reasonable person. Challenging these elements can be a defense.

Hire a Computer Tampering Lawyer in Arizona

If you’re facing computer tampering charges in Arizona, you need an experienced computer crimes defense attorney who understands the complexities of digital crime laws. At Feldman & Royle, our experienced lawyers have successfully represented individuals accused of computer tampering throughout the state, whether the charges involve unauthorized access, data theft, or network interference.

Many people charged with computer tampering feel overwhelmed by the technical evidence stacked against them. However, it’s important to remember that the prosecution must prove elements like intent and unauthorized access beyond a reasonable doubt—something that is often challenging in cases involving digital records and forensic analysis.

Our Arizona computer tampering & internet crime defense attorneys have a proven track record of achieving favorable outcomes, both through plea negotiations and trial victories. Contact us for a free and confidential consultation to discuss how your charges may be reduced, amended, or dismissed entirely.

Our Past Results
Adam Feldman and Bret Royle, Criminal Defense Attorneys in Phoenix
FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Computer tampering involves unauthorized access, alteration, or damage to computer systems or data.

Intent is a key factor; accidental damage typically does not constitute tampering.

Penalties can range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity and impact of the tampering.

Defense strategies can include challenging the evidence, proving authorization, or demonstrating a lack of harmful intent.

Contact a legal expert like Feldman & Royle to understand your rights and develop an appropriate defense strategy.
We are available
Table of Contents
Terms

No tags assigned to this post.

White Collar Crime Crime Types
Other Related Crimes

Free Consultation

Incident Occured in Arizona?
DISCLAIMER: The material found on this website is intended solely for informational purposes. Nothing on this website is intended to constitute legal advice specific to any individual or case. No information provided, e-mail inquiry generated, or reply from our firm through this website establishes an attorney-client relationship
© 2025 Feldman Royle, Attorneys at Law