Arizona defines computer tampering under A.R.S. § 13-2316 as knowingly accessing, altering, damaging, or destroying any computer or computer system without authorization. This can include a range of activities –
In layman’s terms, computer tampering, in the context of Arizona law, involves unauthorized access or manipulation of computer systems, data, or networks. Our computer crimes defense lawyers at Feldman & Royle have expertise in cyber law and emphasize the importance of understanding the specific legal definitions and implications of computer tampering, as it can have significant legal consequences in defending your case. We also help you understand that the intent behind the actions and the extent of the damage or alteration play a crucial role in these cases.
Our Computer Crimes Defense Lawyer at Feldman & Royle advises that individuals accused of computer tampering have specific rights, including the right to legal representation and the right to challenge the evidence against them. It’s essential to seek a lawyer experienced in cyber law to navigate the complexities of these cases effectively.
In Arizona computer tampering cases (governed primarily by ARS § 13-2316), individuals have the same fundamental rights as those accused of any other crime, along with specific defense considerations relevant to computer offenses:
Given the technical nature and severe penalties (felony classifications ranging from Class 6 to Class 2) associated with computer tampering, exercising these rights effectively almost always requires the expertise of a skilled internet crime defense attorney in Phoenix, such as our lawyers at Feldman & Royle.
Defenses against computer tampering charges can vary. Feldman & Royle often explore defenses such as lack of intent to cause harm, authorization to access the system in question, or challenging the evidence regarding the extent of damage or alteration. In some cases, demonstrating a lack of knowledge or understanding of the actions being illegal can also be a defense.
Defending against computer tampering charges (ARS § 13-2316) in Arizona often involves challenging specific elements the prosecution must prove. Here are common defenses:
No Legitimate Purpose for Reckless Conduct (Specific to § 13-2316(A)(5)): For charges related to recklessly using a computer to alarm or terrorize, the prosecution must also prove the conduct served no legitimate purpose and caused substantial emotional distress to a reasonable person. Challenging these elements can be a defense.
If you’re facing computer tampering charges in Arizona, you need an experienced computer crimes defense attorney who understands the complexities of digital crime laws. At Feldman & Royle, our experienced lawyers have successfully represented individuals accused of computer tampering throughout the state, whether the charges involve unauthorized access, data theft, or network interference.
Many people charged with computer tampering feel overwhelmed by the technical evidence stacked against them. However, it’s important to remember that the prosecution must prove elements like intent and unauthorized access beyond a reasonable doubt—something that is often challenging in cases involving digital records and forensic analysis.
Our Arizona computer tampering & internet crime defense attorneys have a proven track record of achieving favorable outcomes, both through plea negotiations and trial victories. Contact us for a free and confidential consultation to discuss how your charges may be reduced, amended, or dismissed entirely.
No tags assigned to this post.